天才一秒记住【畅想小说网】地址：http://www.cxtra.net
&ithisstudywere27esestudentsaudentsenrolledinalargepubliiversityiedStates.Ofthe27esepartits，16weremalesand11werefemales;19werefreshmen，sixweresophomoresandtwowerejuniesrangedfrom18to21，withanaverageageof19.1.TheydifferentmajorsinputerSgineering，PhysiagemeiveStudies，AathematidEics.ExceptforfivestudeheirhighschooledutheUS，alloftheother22fiheirhighsa.Amongthe17Ameripartits，tenweremalesandseveehreeweresophomoresandfourwerejuniors.Similarlytotheesepartits，theiragesrangedfrom18to21withanaverageageof18.9years.AllofthemfiheirhighstheUS.Theirmajorsingineering，Biology，Chemistry，Elemeion，HospitalityandTemes，andEidwerethereforealsodiverse.Adetailedprofileofthepartitsissho
&its’profile
2.2Data
Datawerecollectedbyusiioerviews.ThequestioedfromDeckert（1993）aal.（2008），edthreeparts.Thefirstpartaskedforstudents’demographiation，whicludedtheirage，gender，yearinsajor，nationality，andtheplacewheretheyfiheirhighschooledu.Thesedpartiionsaskingforstudeeduandingofplagiarism，previousinstruplagiarism，andattitudestiarisThelastpartincluded10daskedstudentstojudgewhetherthesecaseswereplagiarismaheiracceptability.Thesemi-struterviewswereusedtoeliationfromstudentswithregardtotheirpersofandattitudestiaris
&hequestioributedtothepartits，apilotstudywasductedwithfiveesestudentsandfourAmerits，ehesameuotesttheapplicabilityofthei.Basedosofthepilotstudyaiospartigiudy，modifiadetiionnaire.
&udyrevealedthatstudentshadsuffitprofiEnglishtoallowthequestioobeadministerediobothpopulations.Fortheesepartits，thequestionnairewasadministeredinasingleclassperiod（50miyearpositioudeheeriodtofinishthesurvey，butmostofthestudentsfihinhalfanhour.FortheAmeripartits，thequestionnairewasadministeredviaemail.Altogethertheresearcherdistributedthequestioo30esestudentsaudehequestionnaireswerehandedin，27eseresponsesand17Ameriseswerefoundtobevalidandstitutedthequestioaforthisstudy.
SixesestudentsandfourAmeritspartitheinterviews.gstudents’oralprofiterviewwasduglish，too.However，ineesepartitshaddifficultyexpressingthemselvesiheyweretoldtofeelfreetocode-switEnglishaerviewswerealldutheresearcher’sofficewithaquieteablef.Alltheinterviewswererecordedwiththetoftheierviewswiththeesestudentslastedfrom15to20minutes，whiletheiheAmeritslastedforabout10miheversationwithesestudeoutheiraboutplagiarismandtheinflueneselisherenotdiscussedartits.
2.3Dataanalysis
&udeothequestioaiheywerefirstgpseudonymssothatlatertheiransatchedwiththequestionnaireresponses.
&s’respohequestionswithyesorheirdemographiatioioaspreadsheetinwhichthestudents’answerswereahroughmathematicalcal;students’judgmentsofcasesofplagiarismwerethe.StudeotheopeioypedintoaWorddot.Theinterviewregsweretraegorizedbasedohemesfoundis’respohequestioheiions，andtheresearchquestions.
&sandDis
Thissereportstheresultsofdataanalysistoaddressthethreeresearchquestioions3.1aheahefirstresearchquestion—“Doesestudentshaveaderstandiionofplagiarism?Ifnot，whatistheheirmisuaiohestudeedknowledgeofplagiarismandtheirpreviousinstruplagiarisSe3.2discussestheofesestudeion3.3discussesthesedresearchquestion—dAmerits’persofplagiarism—byexaminingtheirrespoheteoplagiarismwiththeassistaablesthatsummarizetheresultsaaileddissfollowiables.Fiion3.4providestheahethirdresearchquestioitudestiarism—thrthepartits’ahequestioherplagiarismisamoralissueaherplagiarismshouldbetolerated.
3.1Studeedknowledgeofplagiarism
Thissereportsstudents’knowledgeofplagiarisminthreeareas:studehewiarismaion，previousinstrureplagiarism，as’self-repreeofplagiarisTable2summarizestheoverallresults，whileadetailedreportofresultsanddissisinthefollowiions.
&udeedknowledgeofplagiarism
3.1.1Studeionsofplagiarism
AsshowninTable2，wheheykhewiarism，allpartits，Ameridesealike，claimedthattheydid.AlltheAmeritsrovideaionofplagiarismsuchas“usingothers’wordsasone’sown.”
However，someesepartits，rovideadefinitionofplagiarism，revealedtheirmisuanding.Forexample，somestudentsanswered，“gothers’examlagiarismandifyoudidthat，youwouldgetzerooudentC11）.Thisihisrespo’smisuandingofplagiarismasg，whichmayhavebeehesimilarityofesetranslatiiarism“Chaoxi，Piaoqie”
aing“Chaoxi，Zuobi”
ying）beingapplicabletobothwords.Despitetheexistenisuanding，mostesestudentscouldrelateplagiarismtogothers’words.Inparingthesefindi’s（1993），anadvanesestudents’kermplagiarismisobservedoverthepastt
WhatisalsalthoughnotshowableisthatthedefinitionsprovidedbyesestudeheirhighschooledutheUSwereveryclosetothedefinitionsprovidedbyAmeritsandweremoreaccuratethaheresestudentsasshowninthefollolagiarismreferstotheathatoher’sarticles，oreveheirownworks”
（Studentd“Plagiarismisthatyoutakeotherpeople’swordsasyourowhisresultistwiththefindingsfromSong-Turner（2008），whofound“theloswereimmersediraliaionaleheclosertheirdefinitioowardstheWesternview”
（p.42）.ThisiheiheWesternlearningeos’knowledgeofplagiarismas’willioaccepttheWesternnotionofplagiaris
3.1.2Previousinstruplagiarism
AlltheAmeritsreportedtheyhadrestruplagiarismbothiarysdsedaryschhschool，theearlierinstrugbriefaermorepreheervietsprovideaclearerpithispoint.
Ilearplagiarismlateiaryswestartedersthatwehadtodoresearchover...They[instructors]toldthevariousasthatwereplagiarisgothers’workwithoutgivi.Theysaidthatit[plagiarism]wasacademiestyandcouldgetusfailedoutofthedintotheprincipal’soffice.（StudentA2）
Earlyoaryschoolperhapsthirdrade;learociteproperlyihgrade.Plagiarismwasmadeclearthatitisanactofgbyotherperson’sworksuchasapeerorascholarwhetheritbefromprihecesexplainedinhighssistedofafailihepaper，afailiheclassdepeheinstrudsometimessuspensionfromschool.（StudentA3）
Inorethanhalf（51.9%）oftheesepartitsclaimedhaviruingtotheuy.Amongthosewhoclaimedhaviru，theyvariedtoagreatextentastotheinstrutheyhadreereceivedstrutheywerestudyingfhschooledutheUS（e.g.，StudenteheardtheideafromtheirfrieudentelearitfromTVudenterestruwhiorethanawarcopy”
（e.g.，StudentC9）.Thesedifferencesaremorevisiblewhenlookihetranscriptsoftheinterviews.
Inhighsoreclasses...thoseinstrusaidweeothers’wordsandideas，aodoitinapartiat，althoughIkindotwhatthoseformatsare.（StudentC4）
Myfriendwhoisstudyingabroadtoldmeabout“lagiarism”
本章未完，请点击下一章继续阅读！若浏览器显示没有新章节了，请尝试点击右上角↗️或右下角↘️的菜单，退出阅读模式即可，谢谢！