畅想小说网

Appendix 3(第3页)

天才一秒记住【畅想小说网】地址:http://www.cxtra.net

beforeIiversity.Ithinkitwastenmonthsbefore.Shetoldmethatplagiarismyingother’swother’sideawerebothasofplagiarisShealsotoldmeabouttheces.Thecradeandpersowillbeaffected.(StudentC21)

Thenewssaiditisillegalbehavior.shavetherightthattheirliteraryaputareprotected.PlagiarizingbehaviorletobefiudentC10)

&oldusthatdonotcopytheessaywhichyouseeonthebook...Besidesthat,tea’tsaywhataslagiarisSoallIknolagiarismisessayisplagiarisButIdonotknowifIcopyafewsewilltasplagiarismornot.(StudentC9)

&hatmashaveneverreyinstruplagiarisminaisiheresultsofBamfordandSergiou(2005),andZhang,Li,andDuan(2008).Thissuggeststhatalaatistruplagiarismiioialcauseforesestudents’beingaorelikelytoplagiarize.

3.1.3Studeeddegreeofplagiarism

Wheheyhadaderstandingofplagiarism,alltheAmeripartitsbelievedtheydid.Asfortheesestudents,most(70.4%)ofthemaheother29.6%thoughttheydidnothaveaderstandihestratedbyboththeAmeridesestudentsportedbytheirperformanjudgiobeplagiarismornot.OnlyfiveAmeritsandtwoesestudeely.Thedetailedresultsmentswillbereportediiothestudeedknowledgeofplagiarismandtheirrealknowledgeofplagiarismiheymaylackadequateself-awarenessofwhattheyreallyknolagiarism;theythoughttheykheythoughtwhattheyuoodofplagiarismlagiarismwasreallyabout.Thismismatchalsocallsforquestios’self-repability.Therefore,othermethodologiessuchastestis’judgmentsonplagiarismandinterviewsareoeiooobtainmorereliabledata.

3.2Students’aboutplagiarism

Knowingaboutstudents’helpteaderstaheirknotionsofplagiarismaeacherstohelpthemgaiandingofplagiarisAlltheAmeritsreportedtheyhadnoaboutplagiarismandwereverytintheirofplagiarisIntrast,theesestudentsexpressedaboutthedefinitionofplagiarism,ces,and,mainly,whatasweresideredplagiarisRegardiects,i.e.,thedefinitionandcesofplagiarism,studeoknowwhattheywere.Butasforwhatastitutedplagiarism,theyexpressedbothands.OalkedabouthisexperiengonlineresourdbeingaccusedbyhishighsstrutheUS.Hewaswritingahedangerofexcessivedrinking,butheotthinkofmanyceshimself.Therefore,hesearchedtheesewebsiteBaidu(aseareusedbymostesepeopleatoGoogleintheUS)formoreinformatioigaboutthepotentialharmtoomuchalcohol.Thinkingituseful,hesummarizedthatartidtrahesummaryintoEnglish.Whenaskedwhyhedidhesourwhereheobtaiinformationbyhisinstructor,heaheessayhimself.Hewasaccusedafterwardssirusistedthatthepotentialharmofexcessivedrinkingdisthatessaysoundedprofessional,amusthaveborrowedothers’informatioerview,heaskedmeifIthoughtthatlagiarisIsaidyes.Heseemedveryupset.Iaskedwhyhesaidthathewrotetheessayhimselfandaskedifhedidnotadmitusingonlineresourcesbecausehewasafraidofbeingaccused.Hesaid,

ItwasnotthatIdarednotadmit.ItwasthatIdidnotthinkIlagiarizingatall...becauseIdidnotcopytheseIwasjustsummariziitheproarizing,Iaddedmyaherefore,Ithinkthatisnotplagiaris(StudentC4)

ThisiesestudentsmayhavediffereandingsofwhatastituteplagiarisThiserandingofplagiarismbefurtherevideherinterviewee’sreflehishighschoolexperieheUS.

IwasshomyhighschohtmeplagiarizingbecauseIaskedthefatherinmyhostfamilytorevisemyessayforme!Iwrotethedraftaoeditforme.Theideawasmihelpiheexpressions.That[beingaccused]wasverydisg...ButIwasnottheonlyone.Oneofmyclassmateswasalybecauseheusedonewordfromthevideogameorldcraft)Theteachersaidthatwasatermandhe[myclassmate]otwritethewordonhisowhavecopieditfromsomeoudentC14)

&siesestudentsmayhavesomeaboutwhataswereplagiariziheyweretoldbytheirinstructorslagiarismwas,itmighttakethemlestandabsorbtheWesternnotion.

3.3Judgingplagiarism:astudeive

&swereaskedtojudgeifthetencaseswereplagiarismandiftheytablebehavior.Table3reportsthementsofthedAmerits.Table4preseailedresultsforthestudents’judgmerespoeforeachcase.

3.3.1Overallessofjudgments

ThisstudymakesadistiweeswhoreceivedtheirhighschooledudthosewhoreceivedtheirhighschooledutheUS.Thisdivisionisreasoheresultsshedifferehecorreseratesbetweewogroupsofstudehatlookingatallesestudeherwouldbemisleading,asshowhedisbelow.

Table3.Corresesofjudgments

Note:dsfortheesepartitswhoreceivedtheirhighschooledua;dsfortheesepartitswhoreceivedtheirhighschooledutheUS;CH-ALLstandsforalltheesepartits.

Ihe“Nments”

displaysthehecaseswherethestudejudgments.“Miheminimumcorresesprovidedbythestudents;“Max”

referstothemostcorresesprovidedbythestudents;“Meaheaveragenumberofcorresesprovidedbythestudents.Itwascalculatedbythesumofthecorresesofallthepartithegroupdividedbythetotalhepartithatgroup.Thatbeingsaid,forexample,theMinfortheAmeritswassix.Thismeansthat,amongthe17USpartits,theonewhoprovidedthefewestcmentsmadesixcmeendalltheothersmadeequaltoormorethansixcmeeheMaxforAmeritswaste,amongthe17USpartits,theonewhoprovidedthemostcorresesjudgedalltely.TheMeanfortheAmeripartitswaseight,meaningthate,everyAmeritmadeeightcments.ItwascalculatedbydividingthesumofeachAmerit’scorresesbythetotalheAmerits.

Takingallthe27esestudentsasagroup,thefewestcorreseswerefour;themostcorreseswereten;andtheaveragecorreseswereseven.Itbeseenthatboththehefewestandtheaveragecorresesofthe27esestudentsweremuchsmallerthaheAmerits,signifyingthediffereheuandingofplagiarismbetweewogroupsofstudents.However,whentherespohefiveesestudeheirhighschooledutheUSarately,theresultsshowedthatthisgroupofstudentssuchhigher:thefewestcorreseswereeight;themostcorreseswereten;andtheaveragewashefiveesestudeedfrroup,theother22esestudentshadeveresponses:fourforthefewest;hemost;andsixe.ThissuggeststhattheAmerihighschooleduflueudents’judgmeionsofplagiarismandthat“despitevariousiuralgesandstruggles,mostesestudents...havemaosurvivethedemandsofthelearningeoadaptanddevelop”

(Gu&Brooks,2008,p.340).Oherhand,itsignalsthelastruplagiarisminesehighschools,otentiallycausedstudents’anddiffiuaionofplagiarisHowever,weshouldbecautiouswheheseresultssiheheCH-USgroupisrelativelysmall.

3.3.2Students’judgmeencases

&swereaskedtojudgeifthetencaseswereplagiarism,andifthoseastableregardlessofthoseasbeingplagiarismornmentsareshowhetable,“Plagiarism”

measjudgedthatcaseasplagiarism;“Acceptable”

meassideredthataacceptable.“essrate”

istheperberofthestudentswhomadethecmentforacase.Similartotheoverallrateanalysis,theesestudeheirhighschooledutheUSaingfromaesehighschoolarately;theresultsforthisanalysisareinTable5.

&udents’judgmentsontencases

Table5.esestudents’judgmentsvis-à-viswheretheyattendedhighschool

Note:dsfortheesepartitswhoreceivedtheirhighschooledua;dsfortheesepartitswhoreceivedtheirhighschooledutheUS.“Plagiarism”

本章未完,请点击下一章继续阅读!若浏览器显示没有新章节了,请尝试点击右上角↗️或右下角↘️的菜单,退出阅读模式即可,谢谢!

如遇章节错误,请点击报错(无需登陆)

新书推荐

我绑架了时间线超凡血统整合体无尽剑装从大话西游开始打穿西游九印神皇重生公主大人太嚣张无双召唤之诸天神魔世嫁授徒万倍返还,为师从不藏私我的师傅是妖女天元仙记重生后在偏执大佬怀里撒野怪谈作者拖更日记罪青春香江王朝我们的家族没落了数风流人物奥术神座神秘之旅我家老婆可能是圣女综艺上,我专戳主角团的肺管子邪医妖妃名动天下妙手人生诸天从流月城开始席爷每天都想官宣